migatrtortior
You wrongly believe this article by the NYT is a right wing conspiracy theory, xenophobic, anti semetic, fascist, racist etc
You wrongly believe this true left wing view on migration is xenophobic,right wing, racist, anti semetic, fascist etc
You wrongly believe that Andrea Nagle “A Left Case Against open borders” is xenophobic, fascist, anti semetic, racist,right wing
You wrongly view these views "I view deporting illegal immigrants for virtually any reasons in a negative light because I am not a fan of any Americans, legal or illegal emigrating from the US at all.
Americans (legal and illegal) emigrating from the US to other countries saddens me because I miss Americans (legal and illegal) when they emigrate to another country like I miss my family and friends when they die and because I feel their moving away from the US is too big of a shake up in their lives
Moreover deportation is also a waste of taxpayer money" as xenophobic, racist, anti semetic, right wing, fascist etc
If you wrongly believe this view "I am against smugglers (like coyotes) smuggling in illegal immigrants into the US. I believe the US should extremely increase security to prevent those smugglers from that and to shut down their smuggling businesses" is xenophobic, racist, anti semetic,right wing fascist etc
If you wrongly below the views below
"The US must work in Central America to address the root causes of migration from Central America, to recognize that we don't need to sacrifice our humanity in the name of security. We also must work with Mexico to make sure that it takes its own border security seriously.
Moreover, working with our neighbors to improve security across the region is an imporant component of any policy to promote prosperity and fairness in the hemisphere. A safe and secure region will lead to a safer, more secure United States.
I also believe that the US also must engage with countries like Mexico and in Central America to address the causes that cause them to migrate to the US illegally" are xenophobic, racist, anti semetic,right wing fascist etc
If you are wrongly more open borders than Radgeek and or you believe that Radgeek is xenophobic, racist, anti semetic,right wing fascist etc based on his/her migration views
If you wrongly believe this view : "I realize that mass illegal migration and overwhelming/endless legal migration (the type of migration where can barely afford to take care of our own people let alone overwhelming/endless migrants) is beneficial to the capitalist class and thus that makes me feel that mass illegal migration and overwhelming/endless legal migration is effectively a net negative in my eyes. Many migrants come in and take jobs away from citizens which increases unemployment
When migration that happens within a capitalist countries (like the US) sadly it can be seen as a modern day version of bondage (like in the Old South)
Back then, there was colonialist exploitation happening within a capitalist country via bondage due to similar conditions to today.
Today via mass illegal migration and overwhelming/endless legal migration, legal migrants and illegal migrants sadly end up working below minimum wage or barely minimum wage in a subsistence type existence (like construction work of migrants in some parts of the US for example) within a capitalist country not too much better or different than the type of dehumanizing capitalist worker exploitation that slaves were put through in the Old South.
A lesser but still relevant reason I don’t sound strongly pro migrant (even though I am Left wing on migration), is because I see the negative effect of migration in that migration is used to undercut wages and that migration can be detrimental to the entire working class (though we should gladly share what we make with foreigners specially if they’re in need) . The US needs to stop monopolizing our job market
Ideally, migration should be designed around the economic interests of the American people and especially Americans at the bottom of the labor market . " is xenophobic, racist, anti semetic,right wing fascist etc
You wrongly believe that clearing the migration backlogs is xenophobic, racist, anti semetic,right wing fascist etc
If you wrongly believe that building a Refugee Nation is xenophobic, racist, anti semetic,right wing fascist etc
You are wrongly against e-verify and or you wrongly believe that supporting e-verify is xenophobic, racist, anti semetic,right wing fascist etc
You wrongly believe that the Sierra Club, colleges, the government , companies etc should no longer use the word American or citizen because you wrongly believe those words are offensive to non citizens living in the US (and or you believe rightfully being against such wokeness is xenophobic, racist, anti semetic,right wing fascist etc)
You wrongly believe there is no border crisis in 2023 and or you wrongly believe that acknowledging there is a border crisis is xenophobic, racist, anti semetic,right wing fascist etc
You wrongly believe Joe Biden getting tougher on migration in 2023 due to the border crisis (like he says he will do or said he would do regardless if he went through with it) and supporting such plans by Biden is xenophobic, racist, anti semetic,right wing fascist etc (i.e you wrongly believe this view "I support Joe Biden being tougher on the border in order to stop exploitation of migrants and him properly balancing that with protecting migrant rights" is xenophobic, racist, anti semetic,right wing fascist etc
You wrongly think this plan (even if its temporary): "Personally I feel the US should implement a migration system based on the holocracy model and Dignity proposal for illegal immigrants so illegal immigrants who can’t meet the conditions of one of those systems could be able to meet the conditions of the other migration system
This holocracy model is a new tier or holocracy of longterm permanent residency that would allow immigrants who are in the US illegally who don’t meet the Dignity proposal requirements to legally attain citizenship in 18 years or so
If they register for the new tier or holocracy , illegal immigrants who have lived illegally in the country for a substantial amount of time would be able to work and live in US, while they wait to become citizens, as long as they pay taxes and don’t receive any felony convictions.
All illegal immigrants who don’t meet the holocracy model requirements might be eligible under the amnesty to get 10-year work visas so long as they pass a criminal background check, pay taxes, and continue taking an American job. The amnesty states that these illegal aliens will not be eligible for “means-tested benefits or entitlements” and must pay a fine
After holding work visas for 10 years, illegal aliens would be eligible to go through a five-year program, which includes learning English and taking civics courses, to eventually secure a green card. Once a green card is secured, illegal aliens are able to apply to become naturalized American citizens" is xenophobic, racist, anti semetic,right wing fascist etc
You wrongly believe this view "Moreover personally, I feel that public migration policies should incrementally move towards a different horizon of migration governance in which all people’s rights are respected. For this, we would need an elaboration of citizenship and human mobility laws that are dignified and respectful of human rights.
But to expand rights within the current regulatory framework, until we reach that horizon personally I feel the US should moderately move toward bringing back their 1870s through early 1920s migration system. Eventually when we reach that horizon we will move on from this migration system
Legality wise, I feel that the US should consider making all illegals who have lived in the US and contribute in some way to our society for at least a few years (give or take a year or two), and basically integrated “de facto legal by default” (but without publicly making such a virtue signaling proclamation, only through actions not words)
This way , there would be less bickering and divisiveness over this issue since that would be a stealth way to extremely decrease illegals in the US without deporting them or creating harsh anti immigration policies (but different than former President Ronald Reagan did it with his 1986 IRCA, in part because this wouldn’t be amnesty but a fundamental change to permanently blur or even remove the lines between legal and ‘illegal’ immigrant while retro fitting current illegals into this change by making them ‘de facto legal by default’).
Can’t complain about ‘illegal’ immigrants if there is hardly a line between legal and illegal immigrants."
We should really try to prioritize the concept of citizenship by putting the fact of residence first while we also separate access to political rights from the degree of national identification.
Giving primacy to citizenship over nationality would imply giving priority to our political society, and this would entail a less organic conception of that community, and more open.
The US is the border of North America. But that cannot be translated into being the border control police. This must be translated into a fair and humanitarian vision of migration, which respects the right to migrate and the right to life.
Then after decades of this, I would then want the US to go from being a Constitutional republic with states into a Communitarian Nomadic Empire (along with the rest of North America and maybe Central America) and thus have true open borders by default" is xenophobic, racist, anti semetic,right wing fascist etc
Comments
Post a Comment